"Meta description is not that important anymore since Google can retrieve relevant content in the SERP."
We often hear this statement from SEOers, but that simply is not true. Google's Martin Splitt tweeted that meta descriptions offer Google a summary of what's essential about a web page. This tweet could reshape what these SEOers' believe and re-confirm the importance of meta description in on-page SEO.
The meta description is an HTML attribute (AKA meta tag) that goes the inside the <head> element and provides a brief summary of a web page.
<meta name="description" content="Google Said Meta Description Provides Content Summary - DEANLONG.io marketing">
Meta descriptions are often interpreted to have limited SEO value. However, duplicated meta description or missing meta description, for instances, are well-recognized to have a negative SEO effect, hence the ranking in search engine result page (SERP). The conception is coming from the lack of content where Google bot has fewer opportunities to understand your page:
The optimal characters of a meta description extend from under 160 characters to 255 characters. Later on, Google even announced that there's no limit on meta description word counts. However, Google only shows a maximum of 255 characters, and the system could potentially replace the set meta description with the relevant content somewhere on the page.
Furthermore, SEOers finds it difficult sometimes to summarise the whole page content in a foot-long sentence. So it often concluded that meta description does not help in ranking but for a better click-through rate (CTR).
With that in mind, how to reconcile those observations about the SEO value of meta descriptions? Martin Splitt said that the meta description (along with the title element) provides Google with a top-level summary of the web page.
"Well, they and the title are making up the first impression of what someone searching sees from your site and helps Google Search to get a short summary of what you consider important about the page."
What's more, he clarified.
"As I said: it helps Google Search better understand what you care about in terms of content for the site, too."
Google's Webmaster Trends Analyst, John Mueller, stepped in and confirmed that meta descriptions are not ranking factors.
Meta descriptions can be used for the search result snippet, so if you don't specify anything (on the mobile page, with mobile-first-indexing), we'll have to figure it out ourselves. They're not used for ranking though.
The tweets re-confirm the current understanding of the SEO contribution of meta descriptions. On the other hand, the tweets explain how this element contributes to helping Google understand what a web page is about.
The tweets indicate that the meta description tag plays a similar role to the title tag in terms of summarising the primary content of the page. However, the title tag has traditionally been seen as a ranking factor, but the meta tag has not. (Note: Google Says There’s No Limit on Title Tag Length. Seventy characters should probably be considered as a soft limit. Source: 1)
Avoiding meta description rewrites are also recommended. Google will rewrite your meta description if:
With that in mind, how can you ensure Google to use your provided meta description? There's a relatively high possibility if they meet these criteria: