Optimise Content for AI Citations - A Practical Guide from GPT Insight
Table of Contents (Click to show/hide)

Monthly
Active User Rate

Daily
Campaign Budget

Increase
Click-through Rate

Growth
Return on Investment

Customer
Segmentation

Prioritisation of
Limited Resources

Competitive
Responses

Consumer
Change

Allow me to put my own conclusion here - AEO is SEO, SEO is AEO. Whatever your are doing for SEO, you are already optimising for AI search.
Creating content that's appealing not only to humans but also to AI models is becoming increasingly crucial for online visibility. Recently, GPT-Insights published an insightful article that delves into how Claude, a prominent AI model, searches for and cites external information. Unlike many other AI models, Claude provides transparent insight into its citation behaviour, which offers valuable lessons for SEO content creation. However, it's important to remember that while we can draw analogies, the specifics of Claude's citation logic may not fully apply to other major AI models like ChatGPT and Google's Gemini.
For example:
- ChatGPT (OpenAI): Doesn't have fixed prompt categories but performs similar web queries, typically 1–3 parallel searches. However, it tends to link sparingly and contextually.
- Gemini (Google): Very little is publicly documented, and source citations are rare within Gemini’s chat interface.
- Commonalities across all LLMs: AI models prioritise content that clearly and semantically fits the prompt rather than traditional SEO signals. Quotable, clear, and structured content is critical.
To simplify things, I've summarised the insights from the GPT-Insights article into an easy-to-digest table below. This table clearly outlines the types of content Claude is most likely to cite and recommend—giving content creators practical ideas on prioritising their content if attracting AI attention is a goal.
Key Takeaways
- Freshness Matters: Regularly updated and clearly dated content is essential.
- Be Unique and Niche: Region-specific, personalised, or highly specialised content improves chances of citation.
- Interactive Content: Calculators, planners, and dynamic databases significantly boost citation likelihood.
- Clarity and Structure: Keep your content structured, quotable, and easy to skim.
- SEO Implications: Traditional keyword optimisation is less relevant; the focus should shift to creating factual, clear, and modular content suitable for AI citation.
- Clicks and Visitors: If your business model relies on traffic, ensure your content is not only quotable but also link-worthy.
Full credit for these insights goes to the original, in-depth article from GPT-Insights—definitely worth a read for anyone serious about optimising content visibility for AI models.
How to use the matrix
- B2C brands: focus on community & review signals for Google’s engines; still maintain authority pages for ChatGPT/Claude.
- B2B / technical: invest in white-papers, standards citations and analyst coverage—ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity cite those most.
- Universal play: build deep, well-structured sub-pages; win third-party coverage (news, Wikipedia); nurture authentic forum threads.
Only 9% of Google AI Mode URLs Repeat
SE Ranking recently published a deep-dive study into Google’s AI Mode, revealing just how volatile and source-agnostic it can be compared with traditional search and AI Overviews. Here are the key takeaways every Aussie marketer should know (even tho the test is running in the US market):
- Extreme Volatility: Only 9.2 % of exact URLs overlapped across three separate AI Mode searches for the same query. In other words, AI Mode “re-fans out” your query each time, often returning completely different link sets—even on the same day.
- Trusted Domains Dominate: Despite low URL overlap, most citations still come from familiar, high-authority sites (e.g., Indeed, Wikipedia, Reddit, YouTube)—indicating AI Mode leans on trusted sources rather than chasing the latest ranking algorithm.
- Independent of Organic Rank: With just 9.2 % URL overlap, AI Mode’s selections appear largely independent of Google’s organic top-10 results, suggesting a separate “search quota” and citation process distinct from classic ranking.
Search Engine Journal also weighed in, noting that these findings underscore a shift in how AI search features deliver answers compared to traditional AI Overviews, where overlap with organic results remains low but slightly higher than in AI Mode
What This Means for Your Strategy
- Diversify Your Footprint: Don’t rely solely on top-ranked pages—build authority across multiple, high-trust domains.
- Monitor AI Volatility: Track your core queries in AI Mode regularly; expect different “winners” each session.
- Optimise for Trust: Emphasise clear sourcing and domain authority in your content, since AI Mode citations favour established sites.
While this research focuses on Google’s AI Mode, it hints at similar patterns emerging in other AI-powered search tools. Prepare by broadening your content distribution, reinforcing domain credibility, and staying agile as AI search evolves.

References
- https://gpt-insights.de/ai-insights/gpt-insights-claude-leak-en/
- https://seranking.com/blog/ai-mode-research/
- https://www.searchenginejournal.com/study-google-ai-mode-returns-largely-different-results-across-sessions/550249/